7 Reasons

Tag: @theashes

  • 7 Reasons That Twitter Will Alter All Human Existence

    7 Reasons That Twitter Will Alter All Human Existence

    Twitter:  Fun?  Yes.  Useful?  Yes.  A culture-changing behemoth that will fundamentally alter all human existence?  Yes.  Here are seven reasons why.

    LOL

    1.  Opinion.  Twitter is a hotbed of instant opinion and, thanks to the medium, our ability to express opinion will remain undiminished.  Unfortunately, also thanks to Twitter, all human opinion will eventually come to be expressed in 140 characters or less.  Thus Machiavelli’s view of history as a tool for learning will change from:

    “Whoever wishes to foresee the future must consult the past; for human events ever resemble those of preceding times. This arises from the fact that they are produced by men who ever have been, and ever shall be, animated by the same passions, and thus they necessarily have the same results.”

    To:

    “He’s just like his dad.  Men are all the same.  LOL.

    And Albert Einstein’s,

    “The population of the civilized countries is extremely dense as compared with former times; Europe today contains about three times as many people as it did a hundred years ago. But the number of leading personalities has decreased out of all proportion. Only a few people are known to the masses as individuals, through their creative achievements. Organisation has to some extent taken the place of leading personalities, particularly in the technical sphere, but also to a very perceptible extent in the scientific.”

    Will become:

    “People are becoming more stoopid.  LOL”

    And where we would once have had wordy treatises extolling considered opinion on the omniscient nature of the supreme being, we will have:

    “God knows.  LOL.”

    2.  Mimicry.  And it’s not just that opinion will be condensed to insubstantial gibberish.  Some people will eventually be reduced to saying nothing at all.  Thanks to the retweet button, the lazy and unoriginal will find it possible to maintain discourse with others without ever stating any of their own thoughts or opinions at all.  This will be familiar to anyone who has ever conversed with a Daily Mail reader or a viewer of Fox News but, the spectre of it escalating further is worrying indeed.  Perhaps thanks to the constant retweeting, the world will be reduced to having just one opinion on any given subject.  Rupert Murdoch’s, probably.

    3.  Courage.  And it’s not just that we’ll lack opinions and the capability for extended expression.  Humanity will eventually develop to lack courage.  Because when we disagree with the opinion that someone has just retweeted: “Pink is for sissies.  LOL”, we won’t reply, “No it isn’t.  Chuck Norris wears pink underpants.  LOL”, we’ll send a direct message to someone else saying, “Did you see what @RupertMurdoch1874 just said?  Where does he get off saying that?  LOL.”  Because as people fear losing followers or public ridicule they become more and more timid and secretive and would rather whisper things to their friends in the corner.  Sadly, however, they don’t become any less stupid.

    4.  Shame.  Shame will disappear completely as a human emotion.  As we increasingly rely on Twitter for information that we would previously have acquired through knowing stuff and learning and having a modicum of sense and whatnot – or even just old-fashioned googling things – we will eventually attempt to acquire all of our important life information from Twitter.

    “Is Twitter down?  LOL”

    “Can I eat lamb that’s been in the fridge for over a day?  LOL”

    “Is it weird that my period’s six weeks late?  LOL”

    “Why am I getting so fat?  LOL”

    Seriously, if our dead ancestors came back from the grave and saw the things that people tweet, they’d…er…die again, of shame.  And spin too.  (Okay, I really didn’t think that metaphor through but at least I’m not brazenly parading my stupidity on Twitter full-time.  No.  I’m busy writing this.  I’m saving my Twitter-stupidity for later).

    5.  Emotions.  Human expression of emotion will also come to be affected by Twitter.  People will no longer smile, cry, or frown, they will merely write “*smiles”, “*cries”,  “*frowns”, “*throws self under a bus.  LOL”, to denote emotion.  Whether this will extend to mainstream media is a matter of conjecture (which is fortunate as that’s what I’m doing.  I’m conjecting. I’m a conjector), but it’s easy to imagine rolling news channels with banners stating “M6 Traffic Jam Reaches Sixth Day *sticks bottom lip out”, “Man Found Guilty Of Sex Act With Goat *eeuuggghhh” and “Osama Bin Laden Captured *punches air with fist”.  Well, actually the last one is hard to imagine.  But at least emoting by using the asterisk is some progress from using smileys and emoticons, which is just abusing perfectly good punctuation-marks in order to make a stupid bloody sideways face.

    6.  Internationalism.  As cultures interact on Twitter, entire national traits will disappear as the world becomes a more homogenous place.  After all, anyone who is aware of the Twitter phenomenon that has been @theashes, will have noted that, after 234 years of trying, an American has been finally converted to following the glorious sport of cricket.  This means that, in a mere 71,839,532,700 years, the entire population of the United States will be cricket lovers, and the world will be all the better for that.  And then we can start converting China.  Seriously, Cricket will be the world sport in…(Nope, my computer isn’t powerful enough to compute that.  Probably at about the time when people return to the sea and the dinosaurs come back in their meteor).

    7.  LOL.  As the phrase “LOL” becomes so ubiquitous that every last feckless bastard ends their tweets with it (this will probably happen in about six days time) and we come not to notice that we’re doing it altogether and forget its original meaning, there will come a moment when someone actually wants to write “laughing out loud” which, as it takes up too many characters, they will abbreviate to LOL.  And as all tweets will already be suffixed “LOL”, the tweet “LOL.  LOL.” will eventually occur.  And that will be the moment that Twitter, or humanity (or both) will implode.  Or explode.  Either way, there will definitely be a plosion of some sort.  LOL.

  • 7 Reasons That A Drawn First Test Was The Best Result For The Ashes

    7 Reasons That A Drawn First Test Was The Best Result For The Ashes

    The urn that contains The Ashes (Cricket,ECB,Australia,England,Test Match)

    1.  England.  For England, a draw in the Brisbane test is certainly a good start to proceedings.  We’ve already made certain that there will be no repeat of the 5-0 whitewash in 2006/7 (that I can’t remember) and we’ll be all the more confident as a result of that and, with the monkey off our back, we’ll be able to play more freely; without protests from animal rights activists angered by our wearing of the back-monkey.

    2.  Australia.  For Australia, despite being the home team, and despite the stunning manner in which they won their last home series, a draw isn’t a bad start either.  Now that many of their cricketing greats have retired, to devote more time to highlighting their hair and creosoting themselves – leaving Australia with players in their team that even Australians have to google – it was always going to be a tough series.  A loss would, quite simply, have been devastating for them.  At least with a draw the Australian public will retain some hope and confidence and will continue backing their team; whoever they are.

    3.  Andrew Strauss.  A draw’s a good result for Straussy personally.  It means we’re still in the hunt for The Ashes and, while this test can be seen as a positive in terms of his captaincy, will give him much needed time to work on his abysmal batting form.  Strauss was England’s lowest scorer in both innings at Brisbane scoring 0 and 110 runs respectively, which is 192 runs fewer than his opening partner.  A poor show indeed.

    4.  Ricky Ponting.  A draw, for Ricky Ponting, is no bad result.  He’s already received a lot of criticism from his countrymen and a draw is unlikely to add to that.  Despite him being the most dislikeable man in the history of Australia, I almost felt sorry for him earlier today (? Yesterday?  I just don’t know any more) while he was being booed by both of his own crowd.  And I would have done.  If I were mental.  Or he wasn’t Ricky Ponting.

    5.  @theashes.  Yes, the Twitter user with the best name on Twitter will also benefit from the draw.  The feckless American who decided to give herself the name @theashes without checking Google or Wikipedia first and now has over 5000 new followers and more Twitter mentions than…er…the actual test match got (remember the cricket anyone?) now has a few days (I still haven’t worked out how many, I have no idea what day it is and am also surprised to note that it’s now light outside) to choose which team she wants to support as the two teams are still level.  Then, when a Twitter-mob quickly forms to campaign to send @theashes to The Ashes, she can choose sides without accusations of glory-seeking, before payment is required for a plane ticket and the Twitter-mob dissipates even more quickly than it was formed.

    6.  Spectacle.  The draw leaves the rest of the contest evenly balanced and, as history has shown us, the best, the absolute best Ashes series are the closest fought ones.  Was the 2006/7 Ashes series actually exciting?  I asked someone who actually remembered the series and he said “No.”… “Mate”.  But the 2005 series and the 2009 series were both epic, close-fought affairs in which both teams gave their all and that everyone remembers fondly.  In fact, most right-thinking cricket-fans don’t mind their team losing in a close and exciting contest at all.*

    7.  International Relations.  Because of the draw we can continue to talk to Australians and they can continue to talk to us with pride and dignity intact all round.  We can pretend that Finn and Swann didn’t get knocked around the park a worrying amount in Australia’s second innings and that South Africa is just west of the Isle of Wight, and Australians can pretend that there were people in the stands on Monday and that they were just very small.  And quiet.

    *Did I mention I haven’t slept since…Tuesday?